Day 3: Splitus in Twainii Options

[Josh]

I just hope the masons are working on some form of master plan.

[Lu-Tze]

I still want to know if Trilby is going to get wrathed if he doesn't vote today

Don't kill me Josh.

[Josh]

Yeah, probably.

[Masked Dave]

I still can't believe it's not butter.

Edit: Actually, can I sub in if someone gets WOGed?

[Girdag]

I'm very tempted by Kramer.

The 'wolves are inactives' thing is looking less and less likely, and Trilby's likely to be wrathed today anyway. He's making a lot of noise, but not backing that up by sticking to his guns.

However...his reaction to my vote for XYZIA yesterday doesn't make sense to me from a wolfish perspective. Why would a wolf outright obviously try and get someone to join a bandwagon, then jump off it? It strikes me more as 'change of heart' than 'wolf', tbh.

I'm still suspicious of XYZIA, tbh. Not got much on other people.

[Kramer]

I'm very tempted by Kramer.

The 'wolves are inactives' thing is looking less and less likely, and Trilby's likely to be wrathed today anyway. He's making a lot of noise, but not backing that up by sticking to his guns.

What? I voted for Trilby again.

[Clearasday]

So then it is a wolf ploy. Thanks for letting us know GM.

What the devil are you talking about? Why is anyone still suspecting this? Seriously, this is the dumbest ploy ever if it is. If you actually think this is a clever ploy, letting the seer seer a human every night, and will make the game interesting in some way or another and will lead to you winning, you're going to soon be proven wrong.
HOW IS THIS A PLOY? HOW DO WOLVES BENEFIT FROM NOT KILLING? This is just retarded. I'd vote for Kramer for saying this, but he's actually being sensible and voting for Trilby. My vote is on retracted but I will probably still vote for him, Girdag for wanting to vote Kramer for voting for an inactive, and for somehow believing that the wolves are inactives thing is looking less likely.

You also do the classicly wolfish thing of then reconsidering your vote and giving a defence for the person you've voted for, and thus not make a vote at all.

edit: I realise this post may not be very coherent... deal with it >_<

[Clearasday]

"Hey guys, I've got a great idea. Let's not kill and hope that they lynch the seer."
"Won't that just result in them seering us?"
"Naaaaaah"

Kramer, Girdag, if this is a ploy, who would actually come up with this plan?

[Kramer]

The obvious candidate is The Joker. But since he's not playing, it would point to "Chief Silly Bugger" Kidz. However, he's human we're led to believe.

Possibly C-Dave.

[Josh]

I would, and I would have rocked that shizzle.

[Kramer]

What the devil are you talking about? Why is anyone still suspecting this? Seriously, this is the dumbest ploy ever if it is. If you actually think this is a clever ploy, letting the seer seer a human every night, and will make the game interesting in some way or another and will lead to you winning, you're going to soon be proven wrong.
HOW IS THIS A PLOY? HOW DO WOLVES BENEFIT FROM NOT KILLING? This is just retarded. I'd vote for Kramer for saying this, but he's actually being sensible and voting for Trilby. My vote is on Girdag for wanting to vote Kramer for voting for an inactive, and for somehow believing that the wolves are inactives thing is looking less likely.

You also do the classicly wolfish thing of then reconsidering your vote and giving a defence for the person you've voted for, and thus not make a vote at all.

edit: I realise this post may not be very coherent... deal with it >_<

Possible motivations:

1. To set themselves a challenge = bored veteren = C-Dave or Jim

2. To spread chaos and confusion = The Joker/ Kidz (but Kidz we're told is human).

3. For bragging rights after the game, "AND I didn't even use my wolf kills!" = Hent, but he's not playing.

[Lu-Tze]

I'm going to go with Trilby for now, because I genuinely think he's probably a wolf based on their complete inactivity to date, and waiting for the Wrath of God to get him is woefully meta.

[XYZIA]

Why is everybody suddenly saying silly buggers so much?

I think it's a stupid wolf ploy to be enacted, and I'm going to go for the inactives.
Trilby - Retracted.

[Girdag]

What the devil are you talking about? Why is anyone still suspecting this? Seriously, this is the dumbest ploy ever if it is. If you actually think this is a clever ploy, letting the seer seer a human every night, and will make the game interesting in some way or another and will lead to you winning, you're going to soon be proven wrong.
HOW IS THIS A PLOY? HOW DO WOLVES BENEFIT FROM NOT KILLING? This is just retarded. I'd vote for Kramer for saying this, but he's actually being sensible and voting for Trilby. My vote is on Girdag for wanting to vote Kramer for voting for an inactive, and for somehow believing that the wolves are inactives thing is looking less likely.

Not a CLEVER ploy. But it's something I could see a wolf team coming up with. Tbh, thinking about it, my suspicion is that the wolves forgot to kill on Day One, due to inactivity. Then on Day Two, they didn't kill, in order to make it look like a 'plan', and throw attention away from the inactives.

Although I'm still reluctant to vote Trilby, what with the WoG about to take him. This would throw suspicion more on Lu, tbh. Although I don't know what to make of the public announcement of Hey Kidz as human, that...well, that kinda seems human, just because I can't figure out why a wolf would do it. Alternately, XYZIA, given that he's not been around in the night phases due to partying. I'll put my vote on XYZIA for now.

[XYZIA]

I reckon if Trilby turns out to be a wolf, many of the people on the vote for him will be wolves.

If he's going to die anyway, they might as well sacrifice him.

[Girdag]

That's the thing - lynching Trilby is unlikely to tell us much more than if he was WoGed.

[Kramer]

I reckon if Trilby turns out to be a wolf, many of the people on the vote for him will be wolves.

If he's going to die anyway, they might as well sacrifice him.

A set-up post if ever I saw one.

[Clearasday]

Xyzia, because I'm loathe to vote with Girdag, but how is this a wolf ploy?

Has anyone actually thought about how many inactives there are in this game? I mean, loads of people are. What about you Xyzia, have you been around at lynch time?

[XYZIA]

Erm, I think I have. I've been around though, I would have been able to send in my wolf kills.

And Parv, it might be a set up post, but it's also correct.

[Girdag]

What about you Xyzia, have you been around at lynch time?

He hasn't, he's been partying. At least, Facebook tells me he was last night, and I'm fairly sure he would have been the night before, what with it being his first day back at Uni

Apologies for this all being meta, but still.

[XYZIA]

Ok, yes, I wasn't around for the lynch times, but I've been around for the days.
Considering I bothered to vote, I would have bothered to send off my wolf kills.

[Kramer]

Apologies for this all being meta, but still.

I don't think it's meta, it's all part of the evidence.

[Lu-Tze]

That's the thing - lynching Trilby is unlikely to tell us much more than if he was WoGed.

I totally agree, but I decided that not voting for my prime choice because he was going to get WoGed was an incredibly meta way to play it. WoG is a mechanic to clear out the debris of inactive players who aren't being involved in the game. Trilby is inexplicably linked to the game, and the subject of votes, in spite of his inactivity (and in fact, because of it due to other factors).

[Kramer]

Luke was about last night, he might just not realise that the game has already started.

[Hey Kidz]

I totally agree, but I decided that not voting for my prime choice because he was going to get WoGed was an incredibly meta way to play it. WoG is a mechanic to clear out the debris of inactive players who aren't being involved in the game. Trilby is inexplicably linked to the game, and the subject of votes, in spite of his inactivity (and in fact, because of it due to other factors).

You're just using semantics to argue away the fact that your vote is in effect wasting today's lynching. This is the second day in a row you've justified pretty dodgy actions on spurious reasoning.